The Michigan Osteopathic Association hosts an annual Spring Scientific Research Exhibit (SRE) during the state's largest osteopathic conference in May. The competition provides osteopathic medical students, residents, fellows and attending level physicians an opportunity to present their medical and scientific research to the medical profession.  

SAVE THE DATE!

SUBMIT ABSTRACT HERE

   Abstract submission deadline is April 23, 2025. 

The submitting author must be the first author. First authors are allowed to submit one abstract and can be listed as a co-author on additional abstracts.   Limit 350 words maximum. MOA provides display boards for posters and audio visual set up for oral presentations.  

Honorable Mention $100

 *The ANDY Award, which includes an exquisitely carved crystal piece and a $1500 cash prize, is not awarded every year. Only those who best reflect the principles of osteopathic medicine with their research exhibit will receive the award. 

Submission Categories & Judges Scoring Rubric (printable PDFs) 

• Basic Science Research Abstract Format
• Clinical Vignette (Case Report) Abstract Format and CASE REPORT GUIDELINES 
  
• Clinical Medicine (Research Study) Abstract Format
• Quality Improvement/Patient Safety High Value Case Abstract Format
• Oral Research Presentation

Basic Research
To improve human health, scientific discoveries must be translated into practical applications. These discoveries typically begin at the bench with basic research - in which scientists study disease at a molecular or cellular level.
Clinical Research
Patient-oriented investigations conducted with human subjects (or on material of human origin such as tissues, specimens and cognitive phenomena) for which an investigator directly interacts with human subjects. This area of research includes mechanisms of human disease; therapeutic interventions; clinical trials; development of new technologies; analysis of existing datasets; epidemiologic and behavioral studies; public or community health, or social determinants of health.
Clinical Vignette or Case Report Case Report Guidelines (printable form)
Report one or more cases that illustrate a new disease entity, or a prominent or unusual clinical feature of an established disease. It may include a summary of pertinent patient history, physical findings, laboratory data, or management description.
Quality Improvement (QI), Patient Safety (PS), or High-Value Care (HVC)
Projects or research that demonstrate the aspects of Quality Care as defined by the Institute of Medicine: Safe (injury avoidance or mitigation to patients and/or providers); timely (reduce waits and delays for patients and/or providers); effective (based on scientific knowledge, extended to all likely to benefit, while avoiding underuse and overuse); equitable (provide consistent quality, without regard to personal characteristics such as gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic status); efficient (avoid waste, including waste of equipment, supplies, or ideas); patient centered (respects and responds to individual patient preferences, needs, and values, ensuring patient values guide clinical decisions. High Value Care: In addition to IOM quality care definition: improving patient care through communication (aligning patient values and concerns into care plans) or advancing effectiveness of population health management.

Preparing Your Abstract Submission For a good all-around resource for preparing to submit abstracts or posters, please visit: American College of Physician’s Guide to Preparing for the Abstract Competition.

Abstract Text: 350-word maximum excluding title, authors, and affiliations. 

Judging Criteria 

Judges will assess each exhibit on multiple criteria established by the SRE Committee consistent with generally accepted standards for competitive scientific research displays, including presentation (organization/layout), appropriate introduction/background, clear description of methods, data and analysis, thoughtful discussion and overall clarity of thought. They will judge case presentations on a unique set of weighted criteria. Displays should be readily understood with or without the author present.

The subject matter should be current and of interest to practicing clinicians. Although the committee encourages prospective studies, subject matter need not be limited to new research.

Whenever possible the exhibit should promote osteopathic principles as they relate to the clinical situation or scientific aspect of the display.

The concept of a research exhibit by definition means the display will be graphically interesting.

The following guidelines are offered to assist you with a successful presentation:

Content and Text
Abstract text: 350 words maximum
The research display should focus on Hypothesis or Objective, Methods, and Results of Objectives. A short and legible introduction and summary of conclusions are essential. Your presentation should contain succinct headings that organize and logically display the information. Use large print, including heavy block letters if possible. Keep the text and figure legends explicit and brief.

Graphics
Graphics should be explicit and brief – charts, drawings, and illustrations should be similar to those you would use in making slides. Illustrations must be read from distances of about 3’ or more. Also, use color to effectively add emphasis. Ensure all illustrations are made beforehand. Do not mount your presentation materials on heavy board because they may be difficult to keep in position.

Email Melissa Budd with questions! 

Spring 2024 SRE Finalists & Winners (click here)

2024 SPRING SRE AWARD WINNERS - CONGRATULATIONS!  

MOA Past ANDY Award Winners
Andrew Taylor Still Achievement Award may be presented to an outstanding exhibit during the MOA spring convention only. The ANDY Award, which includes an exquisitely carved crystal piece and a $1500 cash prize, is not awarded every year. Only those who best reflect the principles of osteopathic medicine with their research exhibit will receive the award. ANDY Award winners are:

1993: Frank Paul, D.O. – The Effects of Osteopathic Manipulation on Post-Op Hysterectomy

Lawrence J. Abramson, D.O. Award - Research First Place: Ania Pathak, OMS IV

MSUCOM D.O./PhD Award - Research Oral: Nicholas Giacobbi, MSUCOM DO PHD

Second Place Award - Research: Yutong Liang

Case Presentation Award: Iona Stan

Honorable Mention for Osteopathic Principles Award: Myles Vigoda

Basic Oral Research: Sarah McNitt, MSUCOM DO PhD 

How Does the Judging Process Work?